The Future of Business: McKinsey's Study on the Role of Generativ
International consulting firm McKinsey has released a report examining the potential impacts, prospects, and consequences of implementing generative artificial intelligence.
The automation of new content creation has become widespread due to the popularity of publicly accessible applications like ChatGPT or Midjourney. This new software assists with mundane tasks, learning, and fostering creativity. However, the omnipresence of AI has sparked criticism from individuals and politicians who view this trend as destructive.
Despite the urge for rigid regulation, artificial intelligence persists in its evolution, and companies are harnessing these new technologies across various sectors: marketing, customer service, software development, and more. McKinsey estimates that a comprehensive adoption of generative AI could generate an annual economic profit of around $4.4 trillion. The firm specifically outlines four central areas for this integration and their projected development.
Customer Relations
AI has the capacity to enhance customer interactions and boost productivity (by up to 40%), thanks to the integration of self-service and process automation in both staff training and personal recommendation systems. McKinsey's study revealed a 14% increase in problem-solving efficiency and a decrease in manager interactions. However, as AI learns from the proficiency of highly skilled team members, such stats are primarily applicable to less experienced staff. The projected cost savings amount to $404 billion.
Marketing
Advertising companies can leverage generative artificial intelligence to handle a broad spectrum of tasks such as personalized advertising, data organization, market trend analysis, creating headlines, translations, or product descriptions. This is expected to standardize content style and enhance efficiency by 15%, equivalent to $463 billion. Nonetheless, McKinsey advises the simultaneous establishment of robust human oversight to prevent plagiarism, bias, and the spread of incorrect information.
Software Development
Generative AI has the potential to radically transform developers' workflow, allowing them to analyze, verify, and create initial code using natural language, detailing the app's functionality and design. Given the heightened corporate interest in software and potential productivity increase of up to 31% (equal to $485 billion), many company leaders are seeking to automate some processes. Concurrently, AI-based app developers are creating specific functions for this purpose.
Product Research and Development
AI discussions often neglect the potential of new scientific and technological breakthroughs. AI can assist in selecting appropriate materials, creating product designs, enhancing testing processes, modeling scenarios, and instantaneously testing complex systems. McKinsey estimates this could notably decrease costs by over $328 billion and increase productivity by 12%.
Implementation Prospects
Although previous technological progress phases have led to decades-long reductions in labor activity, AI can profoundly impact numerous contemporary and intellectual job types. Consequently, the consulting firm has updated its AI deployment forecasts, indicating 2045 as the median year when half of all work processes will be automated.
Graphical depiction of a potential AI implementation scenario. Source: McKinsey's official website.
However, AI deployment will primarily occur in developed nations since the economic gains from automation must be equivalent to the average wage, or else automation becomes inefficient. Therefore, as per the forecast, other nations (China, India, Mexico) will begin extensive use of generative AI significantly later. The integration process may take several decades.
Implications
While job loss amongst low-skilled workers is commonly predicted as a primary outcome of AI implementation, McKinsey's research challenges this view. It suggests that the most substantial impact will be on individuals with higher education engaged in intellectual labor. The rationale behind this is that generative AI automation has the potential to fundamentally alter our perception of high-paying intellectual work.
However, such estimates do not suggest that other professions, with lower automation potential, will be safeguarded. Roles involving decision-making, data processing, or multi-directional management—like education, business, medicine, and the arts—are also at risk. Naturally, this could lead to higher unemployment rates and subsequent social crises. Nonetheless, an anticipated annual growth of the economy (up to 0.6%) is expected to mitigate the adverse effects of AI utilization.
Conclusion
As the impact of novel technologies continues to strengthen, the economic potential of AI application appears colossal. Simultaneously, numerous challenges remain, such as copyright issues, potential unemployment surges, the authenticity of AI-generated content, and the freedom of action. These problems need to be addressed by relevant experts and regulatory bodies to prevent destructive policies and the potential dismantling of modern social structures.