#community

On Apr 23rd, 2011, Satoshi Nakamoto said goodbye to the crypto world, telling Bitcoin developer Mike Hearn, "I've moved on to other things. It's (Bitcoin) in good hands with Gavin and everyone." This marked the beginning of a new era for the digital currency. Satoshi's final messages were directed at Gavin Andresen, the newly-appointed Bitcoin Core Maintainer. He encouraged Gavin to move the spotlight away from the enigmatic creator and instead focus on the open-source project, its development, and the dedicated team of contributors. Satoshi expressed his frustration with the press, who painted him as a "shadowy figure" and fueled the "pirate currency angle." He emphasized the importance of highlighting the innovative technology and the collective efforts of the development community. As the years have passed, the hunt for the true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto has only intensified. Yet, these emails remain the last known communication from the elusive mastermind of Bitcoin. The crypto world continues to speculate, but the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto remains shrouded in mystery. Will we ever uncover the truth behind the pseudonym? The enigma lives on.

A recently discovered bug in Ordinals, a system for writing digital collectibles onto the Bitcoin blockchain, has raised concerns and sparked a debate on how to address the issue. The bug was introduced by a developer known as Supertestnet, who initiated a transaction that didn't output a satoshi but was still considered valid in the Ordinals system. This caused the numbering system that Ordinals uses for inscriptions to be offset by one. Ordinals creator Casey Rodarmor acknowledged the bug on GitHub, expressing uncertainty about the best course of action to fix it. While the bug doesn't break the primary Ordinals system of tracking satoshis linked to collectibles, it affects the vanity metric of inscription numbers, which indicate the order in which each Ordinal collectible was created. Danny Diekroeger, founder of Bitcoin Lightning platform Deezy, downplayed the severity of the issue, stating that inscription numbers were already somewhat flawed. Another developer, Rijndael, agreed, noting that the bug should not impact the actual Ordinals themselves, but only the inscription numbering system. As developers and the community discuss potential solutions, it's clear that the bug raises questions about the reliability and security of the Ordinals system. While it may not be a major problem in the grand scheme of things, it serves as a reminder of the importance of ongoing development and testing in blockchain-based systems.